If God really exists then we should be able to prove that He does… scientifically. Many have been taught that this can’t be done. Not true.
Many have been taught that the Bible is not the inspired word of God, but a good book none the less. Not entirely true either.
There are so many scientific proofs that God exists that to argue otherwise is futile. But since so many people have never seen or heard these proofs, we have provided many of them here.
Albert Einstein wrote that the scientist's "religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."
If you want Rabbi Don Goldstein's weekly messages,
fill in the form below
Science in the Bible
By Dennis Crawford Click Here To Read More-
Click Here Again To Close This Box
Science in the Bible
THE WORD OF GOD
One of the major problems many people have today in accepting the Bible as the Word of God is the supposed
conflict between the Bible and science. It is the popular belief that the Bible and science are at odds, that
intelligence is on the side of unbelief, and that only childish or sentimental or uneducated people still trust the
contents of the Bible (ref.2, p.20). This worldview has caused a prejudice that keeps many from even considering the legitimacy of the Bible scriptures. Examining the evidence before deciding will allow for a fair
hearing on the subject.
Science, which is knowledge, is the organized body of observation and experiment on present (repeatable)
processes. Science can examine and analyze present processes and materials, but science cannot say
conclusively how things came into existence because origins are not subject to
experimental verification. Science can only show what can be verified now, not what has happened in the
past. That task is for historians, biographers, and autobiographers.
If the God of the Bible is a reality, He cannot contradict His speech in
nature by His speech in scripture. If the author of nature and
scripture is the same God, then the two "books" of God must
eventually recite the same story--as science discovers more and more and continues to
discard theories that contradict the reality of nature. Science merely documents nature, while God is the reality lying behind all
phenomena, supporting them, directing them, and explaining them. We must be ready to hear the voice of science and
the voice of scripture on common matters. Scientific knowledge is invaluable for a knowledge of the Bible--at least to know it fully and
completely
(ref.2, p.25).
Science is simply the process of discovering the mechanisms of nature which God has put in place to make our
universe work as it does. Science has opened up the secrets and meaning of nature, the creation of
God. Both science and theology deal with the same universe, one part is
physical and the other invisible. Through the scriptures we discover the origin, purpose, and end of the created
universe. The reliability of the scriptures can be validated by logical examination of evidence, just as valid scientific data
can. Through science we find clues, analogies, and confirmations of the existence and nature of the invisible
universe (ref.2, p.28).
If one were to put into operation an automotive plant so fixed that as the finished products were driven off the
assembly line they dropped into the maws of the huge smelter from which they were originally derived, it
would be judged as a case of a perverted and fantastic mentality. Yet this is precisely the type of analogy
much of modern science is following. It is the intent of science to amass all the facts about the universe
in its countless facets; it is the function of theology to give these data their purpose and theological
ordering (ref.2, p.27).
THE FIVE FUNDAMENTALS OF SCIENCE
After practically a lifetime of study, Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), the famous British philosopher, declared that
there are basically five fundamentals of science: time, force, action, space, and
matter. Little did Spencer realize he was but echoing what had been written by a man
more than 3,000 years prior to him! That man was Moses, his book was Genesis, and his statement: "In the beginning [time] God [force] created
[action] the heavens [space] and the earth [matter]" (Genesis 1:1). Thus, with the very first verse of the Bible, it becomes
crystal clear to the open-minded inquirer that there is something special, something unique, about the sacred
text. A closer examination of the Book reveals many startling scientific facts, placed there hundreds or
thousands of years before they were known to the modern scientific mind--buried like precious gems within the text of the
Bible (ref.1,
vol.1, les.#9, p.33).
ASTRONOMY
Job states, in speaking of God, that "He stretcheth out the north over the empty space, and hangs the
earth upon nothing" (Job 26:7). That, of course, is a well-known fact
today. The earth is literally "hanging upon nothing." But we must remember that this was not the concept of Job's
day. Men in Job's time felt the earth was possibly suspended on the backs of four elephants, which stood on the
back of a giant turtle! Or, they
felt that the earth was suspended upon the shoulders of a supernaturally strong man! There were many odd views
about the condition of the earth, but none stated the matter in the clear and correct manner as
does
Job. A lucky guess--when everyone else was wrong?
Isaiah says, "It is he [God] who sits upon the circle of the earth " (Isaiah
40:
22).
The Hebrew word Isaiah used for "circle" means literally something with "roundness" or
"spherically." Of course, the people of Isaiah's time
(and for many generations to come) thought the earth was flat, not spherical.
Another lucky guess?
Psalm 19:5-6 contains several interesting facts. In speaking of the sun, the psalmist says that "His going
forth is from the end of the heaven, and the circuit unto the ends of it; and there is nothing hid from the
heat thereof."
For many years, Bible critics scoffed at the Bible stating that this verse taught the old false doctrine that the
sun revolves around the earth! Then, it was recently discovered that the sun is, in fact, moving through
space. It is not stationary, as was once thought. In fact, it is estimated to
be moving through space at about 600,000 miles per hour, in an orbit so large it would take an estimated 200,000,000 years just to complete one
orbit! Another lucky guess?
There is another gem tucked away in these two verses.
The writer hints at the fact that the sun is the source of the energy of the earth ("and there is nothing hid from the heat
thereof"). An amazing statement, considering when it was written, is it not?
OCEANOGRAPHY
Solomon, long ago wrote, "All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full; unto the place
whither
the rivers go, there they go again" (Ecclesiastes 1:7). The Mississippi River, when running at an average rate
of flow, dumps approximately 6,052,500 gallons of water into the Gulf of Mexico--per
second. Where does all that water go? And remember, this is just the water from one river! The answer, of course, lies in the
hydrologic cycle, of which the Bible speaks. Ecclesiastes 11:3a states that "if the clouds be full of rain, they
empty themselves upon the earth." Amos 9:6b reminds us that "he...called for the waters of the sea, and poured them out upon the face of the earth; the lord is his
name."
The idea of a complete water cycle was not fully understood or accepted until the 16th and 17th
centuries. The first substantial evidence came from the experiments of Pierre Perrault and Edme
Maroitte. Astronomer Edmund Halley also contributed valuable data to the concept of a
complete water cycle. More than 2,000 years prior to their discoveries, however, the scriptures indicated a water
cycle. How? Just a lucky guess?
Matthew Fontaine Maury (1806-1873) was once confined to bed during a lengthy
illness. His son, who had been asked to read for him from the Bible, turned to Psalm 8 and upon reading verse 8, drew his father's
immediate attention. The verse reads, "The birds of the heaven, and the fish
of the sea, and whatsoever passes through the paths of the seas."
It had never been noticed by Maury before. Using this verse he decided to find the "paths of the
seas."
Indeed, he found just that! He was the first (of whom we have a written record) to recognize that the seas
were circulating systems with interaction between wind and water. His book on physical oceanography is still
considered a basic text for studies of that sort. The book, Matthew Fontaine Maury: Pathfinder of the
Seas, by
C. S. Lewis (published in 1927 by the U.S. Naval Institute), recounts the entire
story. Maury "took God at His Word" and found that Word to be fully accurate!
Job was asked by God (Job 38:16), "Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? Or hast thou walked
in the recesses of the deep?" The Hebrew word for "recesses" (or "trenches") refers to that which is
"hidden, and known only by investigation." What then were these "recesses of
the deep" (the Hebrew for "deep" is the word for seas or oceans)?
Man, in previous centuries, thought of the seashore as nothing but a shallow, sandy extension from one
continent to another. Then, in 1873 a team of British scientists searching in the Pacific Ocean found a "recess"
five and one-half miles deep. Later, another team of scientists found in the Pacific
Ocean a trench more than six miles deep! How did Job know the recesses of the deep were there, when they
were not discovered for centuries?
PHYSICS
Moses writes, "...and the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them" (Genesis
2:1). This is an interesting statement because Moses chose the Hebrew past definite tense for the verb
"finished," indicating an action completed in the past, never again to
occur. That is exactly what the First Law of Thermodynamics says!
This law (often called the Law of the Conservation of Energy and/or Matter) states
that neither matter nor energy can be created or destroyed. How did Moses know?
In three places the Bible affirms that the earth is wearing out. Isaiah 51:6,
Psalms 102:26, and Hebrews
1:11 all say that "...the earth will wear out like a
garment."
This is precisely what the Second Law of Thermodynamics says:
everything is running down, wearing out; energy is
becoming less and less available for use; entropy (a measure of randomness, disorderliness, lack of structure) is increasing!
That, of course, means the universe eventually will "wear out." The Bible writers knew it, and stated it
clearly. We did not discover it until a few years back. How did the Bible writers know?
MEDICINE
Moses told the Israelites that "the life of the flesh is in the blood"
(Leviticus 17:11-14). Indeed, Moses was correct. Because the red blood cells can
carry oxygen (due to hemoglobin in the cells), life is made possible.
In fact, human red blood cells can carry 270 million molecules of hemoglobin
each. If there were any less, there would not be enough residual oxygen available to sustain life after, say, a good sneeze, or a hard pat on
the back! We know today that "the life of the flesh is in the blood."
But it was not known even as recently as in George Washington's day. He was
bled to death through the bloodletting process of that day's
doctors. How was Moses so accurate?
According to the Old Testament, circumcision was to be performed on the eighth day of a newborn
male's life (Genesis 17:12). Why the eighth day?
In 1935, Professor H. Dam proposed the name "Vitamin K"
for the factor in foods that helped prevent hemorrhaging in baby chicks. We now know that Vitamin K is responsible for the production of prothrombin by the
liver. If Vitamin K is deficient, there will be a prothrombin deficiency and hemorrhaging may occur, since both Vitamin K and
prothrombin are necessary for proper blood clotting. Oddly enough, it is only on the
fifth through the seventh days of
the newborn male's life that Vitamin K begins to be produced (usually produced by bacteria
in the intestinal tract). It is only on the eighth day that the percentage of prothrombin climbs above 100%!
The only day in the entire life of the newborn that the blood-clotting element prothrombin is above 100% is day
eight. Therefore, the best day for circumcision is the eighth day!
Did Moses have access to modern-day
scientific knowledge, or did God tell him to write this?
Genesis 3:15 says, "...between her seed and thy seed," revealing that a female (as well as a male)
possesses the seed of life. Such, however, was not believed in Moses' day, or even until
recently. Ancient writers believed that only the male possesses the seed of life, and that the female was
nothing more than a "glorified incubator." One writer even suggested that you could deposit the male semen in the warm mud, and
the result would be the same as depositing it in the human female! How was Genesis so accurate?
BIOLOGY
In the field of biology, one of the most commonly accepted and widely used laws of science is the Law of
Biogenesis. This law was set forth many years ago to dictate what both theory and experimental evidence
showed to be true among living organisms--that life comes only from preceding
life and perpetuates itself by
reproducing only its own kind or type. As Dr. David Kirk has correctly stated, "By the end of the
nineteenth century there was a general agreement that life cannot arise from
the non-living under conditions that now exist
upon our planet. The dictum ‘All life from preexisting life’ became the dogma of modern biology, from which
no reasonable man could be expected to dissent" (ref.7). Such men as Francesco Redi (1688), Lazarro Spallanzani
(1799), Louis Pasteur (1860), and Rudolph Virchow (1858) first carried out the experiments which formed the
ultimate basis of this law. It was Virchow who documented that cells do not arise from formless matter, but
instead come only from preexisting cells (ref.1, vol.IX, les.#6,
p.22).
This law has no exceptions. (This law, by the way, is one of the major flaws in the
theory of evolution!)
Thousands of years before the "Law of Biogenesis," Moses declared that things reproduce "after their kind"
(Genesis 1:11-12, 21, 24). You do not get bananas from corn stalks, buffaloes from zebras, or dogs from
cats. Moses was right on target, but how did he know these things,
since the science of genetics
was not instituted
until the year 1900?
Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:39, states that there are four fleshes--those of men, beasts, birds, and
fishes. Today, every evolutionist acknowledges this truth. These fleshes are different indeed in their biochemical
makeup. But how did Paul, an itinerant preacher, know this?
Paul also said that it is God who gives all life (Acts 17:25). For centuries men tried to prove spontaneous
generation true; they attempted to "create" life through naturalistic process, yet always without
success. Men may alter the state that life is, but they cannot create
it. But, how did Paul know this almost 2,000 years ago? One of those lucky
guesses
(ref.1, vol.1, les.#9, p.33)?
GEOLOGY The worldwide flood of Noah's time (Genesis 1:2,6,9; 7:11-24) has been ridiculed
often.
In 1885, Edward Suess was one of the first geologists to publish a study based on the geologic framework of all
countries. His research, especially in his
observations of the world's mountain ranges, led to his discovery that all land surfaces had been under
water. This explains why you find
shells on the tops of mountains. Coincidence?
Many huge fossil beds have been found where great numbers of many different types of animals were
together. The Flood explains this.
As waters rose, animals sought higher ground and eventually were all together,
then were swept off together where currents deposited them along with loads of
sediment.
The evidence of quickly-frozen Mammoths in Siberia is in favor of the Flood.
The Grand Canyon is evidence of the Flood: water cut through material
that was not yet consolidated after it had been deposited by the Flood.
Ernst Mayr, a leading taxonomist, lists only 17,600 species of mammals, birds, reptiles, and
amphibians. How would you get all those animals in the Ark?
Taking sheep as the average size for the animals, you can fit 240 sheep into a two-level
boxcar.
The Ark was a huge box with enough space for 522 boxcars (the measurements are in Genesis
6:15).
This means all the animals would fit, leaving plenty of space for food and
people.
So, maybe the Flood and Noah's Ark are not so far-fetched after all?
ARCHAEOLOGY
The Bible is filled with references to actual cities, places, mountains, rivers, and
civilizations. Archaeology (the
study of history by means of uncovering ancient ruins) has confirmed the Bible record time and time
again.
Civilization began in Mesopotamia: the Fertile Crescent has been
proved to be the cradle of
civilization.
Long lives of patriarchs before the
flood: Archaeology has revealed men living great lengths of
time.
The Sumerians lived in ancient Mesopotamia (sometimes called "the cradle of
civilization") from 4000 to 3000 B.C. , and seem to have been the oldest people to make use of
writing. These people made contributions to many areas which still influence us today in Astronomy,
Mathematics, Geometry, Fine Arts, and Architecture. Their day was divided into two
12-hour segments, and their architecture may have
been responsible for constructing the famous "Tower of Babel" (ref.4,
pp.9-14), from which all languages seem to have originated (ref.6, p.47). Cuneiform from excavations of the capital city of
Mari has produced records of familiar
Biblical names such as Peleg, Serug, Nahor, and Terah, as well as the city of Haran where Abraham lived,
and the city of "Ur of Chaldees" where he lived in his youth
(ref.5, pp.26-28).
From these excavations archaeologists have recovered a record
called The Sumerian King List, which tells of kings reigning for hundreds of
years. The Bible is pretty conservative compared to these accounts, and suggests that before the Flood there was a water canopy around the earth which
created a greenhouse effect, removing the harmful rays of the sun (see Genesis
2:6-14).
The Great Flood: Archaeologists have found many accounts of a Great Flood which are amazingly parallel
to the Bible (Genesis 6-8). The most striking similarities are: divine judgment;
a hero who constructs a boat; even the sending out of birds. Mere coincidence?
Today, many believe that Noah's actual
Ark is still in existence on Mt.
Ararat in Turkey. Some claim to have seen it. Due to its being under snow most of the time, and being located close to the Russian border, it has
been extremely difficult to prove this conclusively.
Stories like the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:1-9); Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis
18-19); and Jericho (Joshua 6) are no longer regarded as myths. They have been
proved by archaeology.
NUMERICS
In 1882, Ivan Panin, a Russian immigrant, had just graduated from Harvard.
A brilliant mathematician, multi-lingual scholar (Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek), and a literary figure, he had traveled as an agnostic and
had lectured often on atheism. He began studying the Bible in the original
languages, of which he was fluent.
Now, both Hebrew and Greek are unique in that they do not use special
symbols for their numbering system, but instead use the letters of their alphabets to represent
numbers. Each letter can actually represent a number, too.
Aware of the numerical values of the Greek and Hebrew alphabets, Panin experimented one day by replacing
the letters with their corresponding numbers in the scriptures. Suddenly, his trained mind saw a mathematical
pattern. The verses he had studied bore unmistakable evidence of "an elaborate mathematical pattern, far
beyond random chance, or human ability to construct!"
This study marked a turning point in his career, and from that time until his death in 1942, he devoted his entire
life to the study of Bible numerics. He later supplied the Nobel Research Foundation with over 43,000 sheets of
his studies accompanied by his statement that this was his evidence that the Bible was the Word of
God. The Foundation acknowledged, " investigation has proceeded, we find the evidence
overwhelming in favor of such a statement." Panin found that patterns of prime numbers, such as 11, 13, 17, 23, "but especially
7," were found in great clusters. When you add up the sum of all numerical values for different words, sentences, paragraphs,
passages, and whole books, you find the same pattern in each of these forms:
The number of words in a vocabulary divides by 7.
The number of proper names, both male and female, divides by
7.
The number of words that begin with a vowel, or a consonant, divides by 7.
The number of nouns is divisible by 7, as are the words that are not.
The same for words that occur more than once in a sentence, paragraph, book, or the whole
Bible are divisible by
7.
Even the number of words beginning with each letter of the alphabet are divisible by
7.
And on and on the list goes!
Some examples are:
Genesis 1:1, the very first sentence in the Bible, states, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the
earth." In the Hebrew, that comes out exactly 7 words that have exactly 28 (4 x 7) letters, 3 nouns (God,
Heaven, and Earth), 1 Hebrew verb (created). Taking the letters of the
nouns and substituting their numerical equivalents and adding them up, you get 777 (111 x 7)! The verb had a numerical value of 203 (29 x
7). This process can be carried out as far as you want to go!
Matthew 1:1-11 has 49 words (7 x 7) in the original Greek, with 28 words that begin with a
vowel (4 x 7), and
the remaining 21 (3 x 7) begin with a consonant, 7 end with a vowel, and 42 end with a consonant (6 x
7). The 49 words have 266 letters (38 x 7); 140 are vowels (20 x 7); 126 are consonants (18 x
7). Of these 49 words, 14 occur only once (2 x 7); 35 occur more than once (5 x 7); 42 are nouns (6 x 7) that have
exactly 49 letters (7 x 7). Male names occur 56 times (8 x 7), and women's names appear 3 times (a prime number), and the
letters of their names add up to 14. How far do you want to check it?
It keeps coming out the same!
Every word, chapter, and book in the Bible checks out this way. The Bible has
its own built-in self-checking
mechanism against someone tampering with it! Take out one letter and it damages the whole pattern! How
could mere fishermen and tax collectors have conjured up something as remarkable as this mathematical
pattern (ref.3)?
One mind, one author--one God; many different writers--but one Writer! Can you imagine the kind of Mind
that would do this, and not even care if you found out?
CONCLUSION
These items are just a meager sampling of the science in the Bible.
How did the writers have this scientific
foreknowledge?
Simple: God had them put it there, through divine revelation!
All conflict between science and the Bible falls into the realm of interpretation of facts--which
interpretation is based
upon assumptions (assumptions that can be in error!). No fact of science is in conflict with the scriptures! To
set science against theology is simply to oppose Creation to Revelation, and Nature to
Redemption. It is the uniform testimony of scripture that the God and Messiah of
Creation are the God and Messiah of Redemption. It is the interest of science to amass all the facts about the universe in its countless facets; it is the function of the
Bible to give these data their purpose and theological orderings. Science without
scripture sets forth the
universal scheme as blind, meaningless, and purposeless, never knowing of an hour of creation, or
consummation, and in the perspective of an infinity of years and an immensity of space our
human hopes, joys, tragedies, aspirations, civilizations, intellectual and artistic achievements are meaningless,
insignificant and trivial. Science in harmony with scripture reveals
the universal scheme as meaningful and purposeful, and human life, with all its hopes, joys,
tragedies, aspirations, civilizations, and intellectual and artistic achievements,
becomes the very center of the universe. It is the insistence of the
biblical revelation that God is the God of all humanity, of all the world, and
of all the universe.
The more one studies the Bible, from any perspective (Science, History, Prophecy, Numerology,
etc.), the more its reliability is established! You can put any test that you want on this book and nothing is even in the
same class. No other work of man in any language even faintly resembles the intricate structure and design of
the Bible. The Bible is not just a book--it is God who has spoken in
history and presents His
Truths of the invisible or spiritual side of the universe. These
spiritual truths are just as "true" as
God's physical truths that science documents
for us. Truth is truth and facts are facts no matter who develops them!
The Bible will stand, and has stood, the test of time and is worthy of your
investigation. The truth welcomes examination. Find out for yourself:
Is the
Bible what it says it is, the Word of God? Or, is it just another book in a sea of books?
WHAT IF?
If all the physical things the Bible says can be proved to be true, then
what about the spiritual
things? Are they
not true also?
The Bible also says that each of us will live eternally, either in heaven or hell, depending on whether we
obey God. The Bible says we must: believe (Romans 10:17), repent (turn from sin--Romans 3:23; Acts
17:30), confess Yeshua as the Son of God (Romans 10:10), be baptized into Messiah
for the remission of sins (Galatians 3:27; Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16), and be faithful until death (Revelation
2:10). If you were to die right now, would you go to heaven or hell?
Please ask yourself: If all the
historical, scientific, and prophetic statements in the Bible are true and
accurate, then what about what the bible says about your having eternal
life (or death) and about the choices you make (or do not make) now that can
affect your eternal future? It is in your best interest to study it and
find out what God requires of those who would be His children (Romans 8:14-16). Do you not think it is worth examining the
Bible to see if it is in fact the Word of God, and to see what you must do to
receive eternal life from God?
Amazing Scientific Considerations Click Here To Read More -
Click Here Again To Close This Box
Amazing excerpts from "A Lawyer's Case For God"
Imagine you are walking along a sandy beach and you stumble upon a robot. Would you conclude that someone had assembled the robot and left it there? Or would you decide that this robot had assembled by random chance? It would clearly take a quantum leap of faith to conclude that the robot just happened by chance, even if the robot had many years to assemble.
Now let’s compare a robot to a human being. I think we can all agree that there is absolutely no comparison. Although a robot is remarkable and many have dreamt of having one to order around, human beings are far more complex and are undoubtedly the most amazing “machine” ever. How did humans get here? Did God create us? To help answer these questions, let’s briefly and simplistically examine some of the intricacies and complexities of the human body.
Your Brain
You have a brain that analyzes, recalls, calculates, communicates, comprehends, and operates your entire body. No computer can come close to that. Your brain even equips you with the ability to accept or rej ect the existence of God. Your brain can instantaneously send messages to your tongue, mouth, and lips, instructing them precisely how to contort so you can effortlessly verbalize a word that someone else can comprehend—
thanks to his or her own brain!
Do you want to see the amazing versatility and capabilities of a simple part of your body? Please open and close your fist. How did that happen? Your brain sent a signal to your hand instructing it to behave as you desired.
Your brain did not have to physically touch your hand to make it move. Instead, it sent an electrical signal through your nerves (biological electrical cables) and spinal cord to the muscles in your hand and voilà, the clench of your fist, the snap of your fingers, or the creation of art. The options and features are only limited by the creativity of your brain. Your hand also collects sensory information, such as touch and temperature, which it sends to your spinal cord and back to your brain for processing. Your hand has more standard features than a brand new Mercedes!
Sir Isaac Newton, a brilliant discerning scientist, concluded “the thumb alone would convince me
of God’s existence.”
While you sleep, for tunately your brain does not shut down.
Instead, it continues to work and keep you alive. It also allows you to
dream. You can dream some rather bizarre scenarios that might include
talking trees, flying pizza, mammoth scoops of ice cream, and horses
in the shape of wagons. These remarkable “special effects” are produced
by your incredible brain!
After a full night of dreaming, you typically awake refreshed. This
replenishing feature is incorporated right into your body. Do you
know another machine that recharges itself…on its own?
Your brain commands your legs to walk, run, or ride a bike with
ease, and even enables your body to multi-task. Many of us can converse
with someone about a complex topic while driving a car or putting
away groceries.When your brain is in conscious-mode, it can remember details of
birthdays and other special events and occurrences for 80 years or
more! I can vividly remember events that happened when I was a
young child and most likely you can too. Your brain also has memory
that enables you to effortlessly recall a commercial jingle or hit song
you have not heard for decades! The capabilities of your brain are
something to behold!
Your Eyes
While you were relaxing peacefully in your mother’s womb, over
one million nerve fibers from your brain each matched up flawlessly
with the correct stations in your retina and your vision was established. Imagine the likelihood of that occurrence!
The moment you were born, your eyes began “e-mailing” three
dimensional digital images to your brain that were, most likely,
perfectly in focus . Throughout your lifetime, your eyelids have
instinctively blinked to provide moisture that is essential to the
function of your eyeballs. Imagine the challenge it would be to sleep
without eyelids.
For optimal performance, the pupil of your eye gradually contracts
when it is bright and sunny and dilates when it is dark.
Variations in
these automatic setting options for your pupils are virtually infinite.
Some eyes even change color in the sun. The standard features on
your eyes are extraordinar y. Your eye is a highly sophisticated and
technologically advanced piece of equipment. Did your eyes just happen
by chance or did they have a designer?
Even Charles Darwin, the creator of the theory of evolution,
acknowledged that it was “absurd in the highest degree” to conclude
that the eye happened by chance:
To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances,
for admitting different amounts of light, and for the
correction of spherical and chromatic aberration,
could have been formed by natural selection, seems,
I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
Your Digestive System
In simple, non-graphic terms, your digestive system includes
four component parts: mouth, throat, stomach, and intestines. You
could not survive without any of the four; they all had to appear on
the scene simultaneously. Essentially a complete and highly sophisticated assembly line exists inside of you!
The assembly line begins with your mouth where teeth tear and
grind up food so it can travel down your throat.
You do not even
have to think about swallowing. It has been virtually automatic
since you were an infant. Just before swallowing you are afforded
the opportunity to savor the flavor of the food courtesy of about
200 taste buds on your tongue.
After swallowing, your body inexplicably creates and secretes the precise chemicals needed, at the
appropriate spots, to further break down the food. This assembly
line performs all necessary tasks as the food travels on to its next
destination. Nothing is out of order. Al l is perfectly fine tuned.
Numerous parts work in perfect harmony with each other; among
these are the tongue, salivary glands, pharynx, esophagus, sphincters, stomach, small intestine, liver, gall bladder, pancreas, and large
intestine.
At the end of the assembly line, nourishment is distributed
throughout your body—to your muscles, skin, and other tissues.
Most of what is not needed is eliminated. If this elimination phase in
the digestive process did not happen, you would explode or be poisoned.
Simply amazing, is it not, that all of these components are perfectly
placed? It is difficult for me to believe that this highly sophisticated
system randomly assembled.
Your Heart and Circulatory System
You are equipped with a heart, with four distinct chambers, which
pumps vitally needed oxygen-rich blood to each of the 75 trillion cells
in your body. This is done 24/7 without any conscious effort on your
part. Your body is capable of replenishing its blood and the blood
itself is capable of distributing oxygen throughout your body. Your blood is also able to clot. Without this “special effect,”
most of us would
die after our first shave, if not sooner.
To transport blood, your heart requires 75,000 miles of intricately
woven blood vessels. You have three types of blood vessels (veins,
arteries, and capillaries) which are anatomically distinct and perform
different functions.
Arteries are elastic; they expand and contract as
they pump the blood away from your heart. Veins return the blood
back to your heart and contain strategically placed valves which prevent
blood from pooling and flowing back to your legs due to gravit y.
Capillaries are merely one cell in diameter and perform various
functions depending upon where they are placed in the body.
Imagine if all of these components did not materialize at the same
time! I cannot imagine the blueprints or engineering expertise required
for such an intricate system. Can you?
You can read the entire book online for free here on this website. Click here to read it now
What Science Can't Prove Click Here To Read More -
Click Here Again To Close This Box
What Science Can't Prove
Gregory Koukl
If science can't even disprove the existence of unicorns, how can it disprove the existence of God?
I often hear the comment, "Science has proved there is no God." Don't ever be bullied by such a statement. Science is completely incapable of proving such a thing.
I'm not saying that because I don't like science, but rather because I know a little about how science works. Science operates on induction. The inductive method entails searching out things in the world and drawing generalized conclusions about those things based on observation. Scientists can only draw conclusions on what they find, not on what they can't find.
Science, by its very nature, is never capable of proving the non-existence of anything.
For example, can science prove there are no unicorns? Absolutely not. How could science ever prove that unicorns don't exist? All science can do is say that scientists may have been looking for unicorns for a long time and never found any. They might therefore conclude that no one is justified in believing that unicorns exist. They might show how certain facts considered to be evidence for unicorns in the past can be explained adequately by other things. They may invoke Occam's Razor to favor a simpler explanation for the facts than that unicorns exist. But scientists can never prove unicorns themselves don't exist.
Since science, by its very nature, is never capable of proving the non-existence of anything, one can never accurately claim that science has proven God doesn't exist. That's a misuse of the discipline. Such a claim would require omniscience. The only way one can say a thing does not exist is not by using the inductive method, but by using a deductive method, by showing that there's something about the concept itself that is contradictory.
I can confidently say for sure that no square circles exist. Why? Not because I've searched the entire universe to make sure that there aren't any square circles hiding behind a star somewhere. No, I don't need to search the world to answer that question.
The concept of square circles entails a contradictory notion, and therefore can't be real. A thing cannot be a square and be circular (i.e., not a square) at the same time. A thing cannot be a circle and squared (i.e., not a circle) at the same time. Therefore, square circles cannot exist. The laws of rationality (specifically, the law of non-contradiction) exclude the possibility of their existence.
This means, by the way, that all inductive knowledge is contingent. One cannot know anything inductively with absolute certainty. The inductive method gives us knowledge that is only probably true. Science, therefore, cannot be certain about anything in an absolute sense. It can provide a high degree of confidence based on evidence that strongly justifies scientific conclusions, but its method never allows certainty.
If you want to know something for certain, with no possibility of error--what's called apodictic certainty in philosophy--you must employ the deductive method.
There have been attempts to use the deductive method to show that certain ways of thinking about God are contradictory. The deductive problem of evil is like that. If God were all good, the argument goes, He would want to get rid of evil. If God were all powerful, He'd be able to get rid of evil. Since we still have evil, then God either is not good or not powerful, or neither, but He can't be both.
If this argument is sustained, then Christianity is defeated, because contradictory things (the belief that God is both good and powerful in the face of evil) cannot be true at the same time. The job of the Christian at this point is to show there isn't a necessary contradiction in their view of God, that genuine love does not require that there be no evil or suffering, and that preventing such a thing is a not function of God's power. I think that can be done, and I've addressed that issue in another place (see The Strength of God and the Problem of Evil ).
So don't be cowed or bullied by any comments that science has proven there is no God. Science can't do that because it uses the inductive method, not the deductive method. When you hear someone make that claim, don't contradict them. Simply ask this question: "How can science prove that someone like God doesn't exist? Explain to me how science can do that. Spell it out."
Some take the position that if science doesn't give us reason to believe in something, then no good reason exists. That's simply the false assumption of scientism.
Some take the position that if science doesn't give us reason to believe in something, then no good reason exists. That's simply the false assumption of scientism. Don't ever concede the idea that science is the only method available to learn things about the world.
You can even choose something you have no good reason to believe actually does exist--unicorns, or leprechauns, for that matter. Make that person show you, in principle, how science is capable of proving that any particular thing does not exist. He won't be able to. All he'll be able to show you is that science hasn't proven certain things do exist, not that they don't exist. There's a difference.
Remember the line in the movie Contact ? Ellie Arroway claimed she loved her father, but she couldn't prove it scientifically. Does that mean she didn't really love him? No scientific test known to man could ever prove such a thing. Ellie knew her own love for her father directly and immediately. She didn't have to learn it from some scientific test.
There are things we know to be true that we don't know through empirical testing--the five senses-- but we do know through other ways. Science seems to give us true, or approximately true, information about the world, and it uses a technique that seems to be reliable, by and large. (Even this, though, is debated among philosophers of science.) However, science is not the only means of giving us true information about the world; its methodology limits it significantly.
One thing science cannot do, even in principle, is disprove the existence of anything. So when people try to use science to disprove the existence of God, they're using science illegitimately. They're misusing it, and this just makes science look bad.
The way many try to show God doesn't exist is simply by asserting it, but that's not proof. It isn't even evidence. Scientists sometimes get away with this by requiring that scientific law--natural law--must explain everything. If it can't explain a supernatural act or a supernatural Being then neither can exist. This is cheating, though.
Scientists haven't proven God doesn't exist; they've merely assumed it in many cases. They've foisted this truism on the public, and then operated from that point of view. They act as if they've really said something profound, when all they've done is given you an unjustified opinion.